Pages

Tuesday

FIFA, censorship, and human error


In the recent World Cup game between Argentina and Mexico, video replay showed that Carlos Tevez, a forward for Argentina, was clearly offside when he scored the first goal in the game (Argentina eventually won 3-1). The replays in the stadium showed the error, and though those are not available for use by officials, they were viewed by the Mexican team.

Fine, that happens. Refs make mistakes, and it's part of the game. You can debate whether or not replay should be used to help refs in this situation (or when the ball crosses the goal line), but I'll leave that for another time. What upset me was FIFA's reaction to the controversy.

FIFA's solution: just don't show replay of controversial plays. This only exacerbates the problem and does nothing to solve it.

I understand that sport (particularly on television, but even in the stadium too) is a mediated viewing experience in which the production staff presents a spectacle for the rest of us to enjoy. But when you're in the wrong, the reaction should never be to deny further information from getting out. Transparency should be paramount - human errors are forgivable, but deliberate concealment of information is not. Like our decision makers in government, our decision makers in sports' governing bodies must not withhold otherwise public information strictly because it makes them look bad.

FIFA isn't alone in doing this. The practice is prevalent in American sporting venues as well. But I chastise FIFA here because a) it's fresh and on my mind, and b) FIFA's inability to come off as anything other than arrogant makes the organization an easy target. Whether or not FIFA is arrogant is irrelevant. Their lack of skill in managing communications and public relations makes them appear as arrogant, and thus they are judged as such. But, perhaps they are already learning to change.

The counter-argument is that seeing the video replay will ignite the anger among the thousands of fans who are together in the stadium. There's possibly some truth to this risk, but even without in-stadium video replay fans can direct their anger toward officials. I don't pretend to have any expertise in stadium security, and thus I can't speak too intelligently on that matter, but I believe that people (even mobs) are more forgiving in situations of honestly rather than secrecy, especially when they know the truth anyway.

Another separate issue is whether this is a good decision for the in-stadium fan experience. FIFA argues that refs and errors are part of the game, and while that's true, fans are part of the game too. Those at home are privy to the information, but those in the stadium are not. I've been to many games where, after a questionable play, cell phone networks at the stadium are overloaded with people calling friends watching the game at home to ask what happened on the replay. That's fine when there's no video board, but when the technology is there and available, don't eschew its use.

15 comments:

  1. The need for police protection for officials isn't rare, unfortunately. In high school (1997), our basketball team lost a game and there were some questionable calls/no-calls by the officials. One player's father had to be restrained while the refs exited; and this was a mid-season game at a small school in north central Connecticut... not exactly a dangerous environment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Having worked with large groups of people, it's easy for them to get out of control; and incredible difficult to regain it.

    In the stadium, at least for soccer (where fans regularly riot, people have been killed, and two countries once went to war), not replaying questionable calls is a smart idea.

    ReplyDelete
  3. They also removed Lampard's disallowed goal in England vs Germany from their official highlights. This seems pretty dumb. If you have nothing to hide, don't hide it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Angus. I didn't know about that.

    Removing Lampard's disallowed goal from the highlights contradicts FIFA's own position. If referees and their errors are "part of the game," then there is nothing wrong with including Lampard's shot. If nothing else, it shows a great head's up play by the goalie, it shows England's quick strike ability following the previous goal, it shows how England nearly tied up the game... all relevant points that can stand on their own as worthy of the highlight reel.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Still....Crazy!

    It's a sport people!!!

    I would maybe flip a finger at someone, or yell something not lady like...but that's it!

    I've heard of parents getting "overexcited" at their kids game, yet fail to understand how parents can do things like that. What a great example they're setting.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It is high time the FIFA introduce technology to the proceedings... mistakes are easy to make- the refs do not have x-ray vision nor are they supermen... that is why technology is here to help! They do it in ice -hockey all the time- refer to the play backs etc. It is time for Fifa to join the future...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have landed here from wordpress freshly pressed... I hate soccer with a deep loathing but have had to keep some awareness of WC2010 so as not to appear a complete prat in the blogosphere! You have laid out your argument very well and for what its worth, I agree. But the issue of subsequent (frequently intoxicated and generally over-heated male) crowd violence is a real fear.. so ban the whole damn game!

    ReplyDelete
  8. If you search for it on youtube, it's not there. Most (probably all) video's have been taken down. Are they taking a leaf out of China's censorship book? I don't understand why they would do that. It's not like people are going to forget or go on an uncontrollable rampage.

    What would have happened had the Lampard goal been recognised is hard to say, but it's too important to just sweep under the carpet.

    This WC has shown up so many referee mistakes in the form of disallowed goals (2 for the US), ignored handballs (brazil) and missed offside goals. Goal line technology is needed, it can't be ignored any longer.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You've stated it quite well, "arrogance can make an organization an easy target" and indeed, arrogance simply enhances the problem rather than alleviating it. Either way, I felt it was still a great game. There's always next time for dear Mexico, and maybe next time they'll include Chicharito in the first half rather than saving him for last.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I agree with Handsome Matt. Replaying controversial plays, IN SOCCER, is a dangerous thing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thank you, Elmer.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I was also surprised with the referees judgement errors in World Cup this year.
    Not only in the game, Argentina v.s Mexico, but also other games like Germany v.s. England.
    The England player surely kicked the ball over the goal line, however the ref did not call it a goal. This cause anger not only from fans who were at the stadium, but also fans watching through the TV screen. Even though the judgement may have been caused by accident, it is important for audiences to know the truth. Though, replaying the scene could bring about more conflict, it's disagreeing for FIFA to neglect doing the reply. I hope FIFA could bring a better solution to the referees errors, and make a decision that is fair for everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As far as I'm concerned, the foremost goal of the referees should be to deliver a fair outcome. FIFA should be willing to take any steps to do that. In some cases lack of replay causes the referees safety to come into question, and that is simply unacceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Unfortunately, this attitude that the judges must not be questioned, even at the cost of faulty judgments, is comparatively common in sporting contexts (and more than a few non-sport contexts).

    I even recall a school tournament in volleyball (or possibly brännboll, a Swedish relative of baseball), where it was stated by the officials that any protest of a judgment would lead to an automatic red card. Certainly, this tournament had no affiliation with the ``official'' sport---but still...

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yeah, it's the time adopting technology to football field

    ReplyDelete